Since we started in June 16th 2016, we’ve put in a huge amount of effort to get to where we are now. Countless conversation, over 60 people involved, workshops across Europe with one clear set of outputs for SMEs working on connected products: Principles that suggest what someone could do to make a better connected […]Read more "A little rebrand: Better IoT"
Without much fanfare and thanks to EVRYTHNG we ran a little session focusing on testing the principles we’ve developed over the past year.Read more "#meetingnotes from Friday 27th"
Seems non-sensical as a title but this is the conclusion that months of work have led to. What appeared a year ago like a novel idea to work on a trustmark for #iot looks more like one of a multitude of players in the space. So far we have found trustmark-like efforts everywhere. This includes: […]Read more "What if open #iotmark was open?"
Two weeks ago 7 of us met in Berlin to clean up the principles. When we saw cleanup that included: Reducing redundancies (they’re not gone yet). Growing the Lifecycle section Improving up the uniformity of the ‘zoom level’ of each principle (also not completely done). This is about making sure we’re using the same level […]Read more "Tools for conversation"
In a short workshop at #ThingsConAMS, a design-focused IoT conference, we asked participants to prioritise the IoTMark principles.Read more "#ThingsConAMS workshop"